There’s a lot of
revisionist history out there. The problem with revisionist history is that a
lot of times the person or people who are doing the revision, put history more
in line with their own particular agenda. Now granted, some things we learned
about long ago didn’t exactly happen the way they were described, and that’s
fine to make things more accurate. But I get the feeling that the ‘accuracy’ of
some of these revisions are even more exaggerated than the original version.
